Well, yeah, of course homes can be rebuilt, but there's always been emphasis on the fact that the Weasleys are poor, and y'know, I thought burning the house down was kind of wtf in HBP, but I could see how it would be absolutely devastating for the Weasleys because maybe they wouldn't have the money to rebuild their home. But then the Burrow is back without any mention of the fire? That just baffled me, that they put in a pointless action scene that wasn't in the book and then rendered it completely redundant within the first thirty seconds of the next film.
And Fenrir... was he? He didn't make much of an impact, for someone who was supposed to make a hell of an impact (and I sort of thought that mentioning him earlier in the film was there so the could introduce him later). Was he the one with the sword, then? I guess they thought that Bella brought enough crazy and bloodthirsty to that scene without adding his crazy, too. Fair enough, but I do hope we get to see him being scary in Part 2.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-11-26 03:47 am (UTC)And Fenrir... was he? He didn't make much of an impact, for someone who was supposed to make a hell of an impact (and I sort of thought that mentioning him earlier in the film was there so the could introduce him later). Was he the one with the sword, then? I guess they thought that Bella brought enough crazy and bloodthirsty to that scene without adding his crazy, too. Fair enough, but I do hope we get to see him being scary in Part 2.