Dysfunctional relationships on V-Day
Jan. 4th, 2011 03:57 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, from my last post on the subject, it certainly seems there'll be enough interest in a dysfunctional relationship ficathon to go ahead with it. A commenter did mention, though, that my idea is similar to the exchange that will be posting at
hp_emofest, though probably different enough not to interfere too much.
But, question about format, since I think both of these suggestions have potential. Option A would mean longer fics and a little more tome to write. Option B might have higher participation, and would be low-pressure. Thoughts?
ETA: Some clarification for those who have asked. A prompt-based ficathon would be me setting up a community and having prompting and claiming sessions very soon, and then a few weeks to write, posted anonymously, whereas a comment ficathon would be like this one, where there is a single post that people reply to with prompts, and people who want to participate write a response to that prompt, usually short enough to fit in the comment field, and post it directly.
[Poll #1663777]
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
But, question about format, since I think both of these suggestions have potential. Option A would mean longer fics and a little more tome to write. Option B might have higher participation, and would be low-pressure. Thoughts?
ETA: Some clarification for those who have asked. A prompt-based ficathon would be me setting up a community and having prompting and claiming sessions very soon, and then a few weeks to write, posted anonymously, whereas a comment ficathon would be like this one, where there is a single post that people reply to with prompts, and people who want to participate write a response to that prompt, usually short enough to fit in the comment field, and post it directly.
[Poll #1663777]
no subject
Date: 2011-01-03 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-03 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-03 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-03 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:12 pm (UTC)(btw I know you were away over christmas some, did you see the Verin fic I got for Yuletide? *g*)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 04:18 pm (UTC)...actually, I wrote it. XD
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 09:39 pm (UTC)ILU so much.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 05:04 pm (UTC)Though I can see that a comment ficathon is less stressful, I don't like them for the following reasons:
1. I find them almost impossible to navigate once they get going. I've seen some with over 20 pages of comments (admittedly, more than we're likely to get, but you never know). Making my way through them or keeping a lot of tabs open, making bookmarks, etc., is a hassle that I usually stop bothering with pretty quickly.
2. While many of the comment stories are fun, and I've seen a few that are downright excellent, they're too short and usually quickly-written to really compel me for long. It's not that I don't like drabbles -- I do -- but ultimately, I think a comment ficathon is like a meal made of nothing but hors d'oeuvres: small, often tasty bites, but not very nourishing in the long haul. And for a theme as potentially complex and interesting as "dysfunctional relationships," I'd prefer more of a main course.
3. And a comment ficathon requires a scheduled time commitment -- they usually start and end in just a few days, at least in the ones I've seen -- that I'm not always able to meet.
But these are just my preferences, and if other people prefer the comment fest, then go with it -- whatever you like best, modly one.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 07:09 pm (UTC)Um. Maybe I should go re-vote.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 07:44 pm (UTC)Sorry to jump in here, but I just wanted to suggest, in response to your first point, that
no subject
Date: 2011-01-05 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-04 06:54 pm (UTC)